Update > Federalism and Ethnic and Regional Political Parties
Federalism and Ethnic and Regional Political Parties
2022-09-06
Important actors in discussions about federalism are regional or ethnic parties, who advocate for the rights and interests of their region or ethnic group. These are contrasted with state-wide parties (SWP) whose focus is on the interests of whole country.
Federalism can empower ethnic or regional parties and build the political standing they need to negotiate with the central government, other federal governments and SWPs. In some cases, this has strengthened national unity by integrating these parties into the national political system. Demands of regional/national parties often relate to the transfer of powers to regional government. They address these demands both directly on the national government, and also through putting pressure on the regional branches of statewide parties through electoral competition. This forces the latter to align their policy positions more closely with the needs and concerns of ethnic or regional minorities in order to cope with the electoral challenge on the regional level.
Case study: Regionalism in India The demands of these political/regional movements take four forms: 1. Demand of the people of certain area for separate statehood. 2. Demand of the people of certain area for secession from the Indian Union. 3. Demand of the people of certain union territories for full-fledged statehood. 4. The demand of certain people for favorable settlement in inter-state disputes. Regionalists and nationalists find themselves in acute conflict in six major areas: 1. Language policy 2. Educational policy 3. Resource allocation 4. Mass media control 5. Electoral competition 6. Using the state machinery under its complete control. Source: Role of Political Parties in Balancing Federalism and Regionalism |
Local Political Cleavages in the Netherlands Source: Independent Local Political Parties in the Netherlands |